Bøker i Earthscan Research Editions-serien

Presents a historical overview of Jevons' Paradox, provides evidence for its existence and applies it to complex systems. This title explains myth of efficiency and explores its implications for resource usage. It is intended for policy makers, natural resource managers, academics and students concerned with effects of efficiency on resource use.

'The Jevons Paradox', which was first expressed in 1865 by William Stanley Jevons in relation to use of coal, states that an increase in efficiency in using a resource leads to increased use of that resource rather than to a reduction. This book provides a historical overview of the Jevons Paradox.

Just four crops - maize, potatoes, rice and wheat - provide more than 90 per cent of the world's food. This book describes a study conducted in Syria of how communities are developing markets for local products derived from neglected and underutilized plants. It also highlights the importance of local cultural knowledge.

First Published in 2008. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa company.

Presents the examination of EPI at the national policy level, focusing on the key sectors of energy and agriculture within Sweden, a country that is widely recognized as a front runner in environmental management. This book deconstructs EPI, and examines how environmental priorities are treated in relation to other political priorities.

Natural resources have historically been considered as being governed in public or private spheres - that is, by the state on behalf of the people, or by companies or individuals driven by the market. This book offers a perspective on issues in resource governance, including the state, NGOs, civil society, communities, and hybrid institutions.

Presents an examination of environmental policy integration (EPI) at the national policy level, focusing on the key sectors of energy and agriculture within Sweden. This work unpacks EPI, looks at what it means in policy formation and examines how environmental priorities are treated in relation to other political priorities.