Bøker i European Academy of Legal Theory Series-serien

This book sets the significance of moral conflict as a core concern for contemporary theorising about law and legal reasoning.

This short book on comparative law theory and method is designed primarily for postgraduate research students whose work involves comparison between legal systems.

Although coherence theories of law and adjudication have, recently, been extremely influential in legal scholarship and have significantly advanced the case for coherentism in law, a number of problems remain. This, the first concerted attempt to develop a coherence-based theory of legal reasoning, addresses, or at least mitigates these problems.

This book explores questions about the coverage and identity of legal research in terms of its expansion to an interdisciplinary field.

This book questions critically, in novel ways and from various perspectives, the possibilities of objectivity of legal theory in the 21st century.

This book seeks to examine the relations that obtain between law and a theory of law and legal reasoning and a theory of legal reasoning.

This book explores questions about the coverage and identity of legal research in terms of its expansion to an interdisciplinary field.

The book focuses on the relationship between law and politics as perceived by the legal community and the transformation of politics into law.

This book argues that our conception of the legal system should be based on a pluralist and communicative approach.

The essays in this book develop a range of new insights into the relationship between legislative problems and legal theory.

This volume centers upon debates about European legal integration, and, more generally, about the methodology of comparative law.

These papers seek to answer the fundamental, scientific problems of comparative research that are too often neglected in comparative scholarship.

This book considers Robert Brandom's philosophy and presents an original and exciting analysis of the semantic argument in legal argumentation.