Bøker av Slavko Splichal

The book, anchored in stimulating debates about the enlightenment ideas of publicness, analyses historical changes in the core phenomena of publicness: possibilities, conditions and obstacles to developing a public sphere in which public create, articulate and express public opinion by means of reflexive publicity within an established democratic public culture. Specifically, it is focused on three central topics:a general historical transformation from "e;opining"e; - essentially some people's view of what "e;the public"e; thought - through the identification of "e;public opinion"e; in opinion polls, up to the contemporary establishment of "e;what people think/want"e; using computer-based analysis of the big data available from digital records, in which the enlightenment idea of public expression of opinion has been replaced by the technology of extracting opinions;the origins and consequences, and the similarities and differences of the rise and fall of two related concepts - public opinion and the public sphere - in historically particular periods, which have in common that they both lie in the boundary area between normative-theoretical and empirical orientation and suffer from unreliable definition and operationalization, which can only be resolved by a closer connection between the two concepts and areas.a specific historical intervention created by the domestication of the German concept ffenntlichkeit in English as "e;the public sphere,"e; heralding a new critical impetus in theory and research of publicness at a time when critical social thought sharply criticised and even abandoned the notion of public opinion due to its predominantly administrative use.

A survey of the historical roots, theoretical foundations and normative claims of 20th-century conceptualizations of public opinion. It examines research strategies such as polling, the "spiral of silence" model, and the role of the media in the formation and expression of public opinion.

This book reports the results of a comparative survey of journalism students in university-level institutions in 22 countries of the major world regions. The students had three different concepts of the role of the press: the enlightenment model in which the prime functions is to educate and inform;